ASK OUR ATTORNEYS

  

          OUR ATTORNEYS:

Chandra Doucette, Esq.

Boca Raton

(561) 995-1490

invattyfl@lycos.com 

Barry Silver, Esq.

Boca Raton

(561) 483-6900

barryboca@aol.com 

Barbara Billiot Stage, Esq.
Orlando, FL
(407) 421-8936

barbara.stage@gmail.com

Jean Winters, Esq.

Boca Raton

(561) 516-0922

jgwlaw@bellsouth.net

ARCHIVED QUESTIONS:

Q & A

Question:

I owned rental property in South Florida . Prior to renters moving in, they had to be approved by the board. I live in Altamonte Springs and asked about the board screening applicants who wanted to rent a condo in my complex and was told this is illegal. My nephew just bought a condo in Maitland and the HOA told him if he wanted to rent it, they would have to screen the renters. Is my HOA just blowing smoke?

P.P. , Altamonte Springs


Answer:

The Florida Statutes do not prohibit condo associations from screening applicants who want to rent a condo from a unit owner and even provide for charging a fee for processing the application. However, an association cannot screen applicants unless there is a provision in the bylaws, articles of incorporation or declaration of covenants and restrictions allowing for screening. If these documents do not contain this provision, then the association is breaking the law by screening.

Barbara Billiot Stage, Esq.


Question:

We successfully recalled our entire board. Our newly
elected board is now ready to start healing our community.  HOA
property was turned over to us, but how do we know we have everything?

   
We have been meeting resistance.  Even requests for copies of
financial reports have failed.  We don't even have access to bank accounts until the new board members sign cards that will give us access to previous records.

  

We knew this would be hard work, but I just wish we had guidelines to help. We don't even know if the books are correct. Should we have all books audited?
I'll start with these questions.   Thank you for your help

L.Z.


Answer:

All HOA documents are the property of the association and not the board. Therefore, the previous board has a duty to turn over all documents to the new board. You should send each member of the previous board a letter by certified mail with return receipt requested, giving them a deadline to provide the documents. If they do not comply, you will most likely have to hire an attorney, unless you can get cooperation from the State Attorney's Office in your area.

You should definitely have the books audited to make sure you limit your liability as much as possible for a previous board's errors.

Barbara Billiot Stage, Esq.  


Question:  

Audit of the fiscal year 05/06 year-end financial report was done by an accounting firm CPA that has worked for the condominium for over 10 years and has always provided accurate and timely reports. The board had shown on the monthly financial reports an entry: "due to reserves from operating account" up to $165,000. The audit returned showing $115,277 due to the reserves. The board does not accept this figure, thinking it is too high. The board and management company are reviewing the figures and say they are coming up with a figure for what is really owed to the reserves. The board has made such statements as, "The CPA who did the audit did not account for reserve expenditures and the audit was a year late." The board has never voiced any concern about the CPA's competency, accuracy, or any other reason for why the board wants a different figure. My position is that I, as an owner, will not accept any changes not done by a CPA in the audit figures. I will not accept figures of an audit done by a CPA but then changed by the board and management company. (Note when I let the board know my position, I got a really hostile reply.) Is the board allowed to change these audit numbers? Do we owners have to accept these changes?

K.B., Tampa

Answer:

This is a question that should be submitted to a CPA or a tax attorney for an expert opinion; however, I will provide some basic information. The real question that needs to be addressed is the reason for funds due to the reserves from the operating account. There are two reasons I can think of for the operating account to owe funds to the reserves. The first would be where assessments collected were credited to the operating account and the portion of the assessments that are for replenishing the reserves need to be transferred to the reserves. This is a fairly common practice. The second reason would be that the funds in the reserves were used for purposes that should have been covered by the operating account, which would be a violation of Florida Statutes §720.303(6)(h) unless approved by a majority vote at a board meeting at which a quorum is present.

To answer your question, it is necessary to explain the purpose of an audit. Not all homeowners associations are required to prepare audited financial statements. Only those associations with annual revenues of $400,000 or more are required to prepare audited financial statements. The purpose of an audit is to ensure that there is no material misstatement of the organization’s financial position and performance and to ensure that the organization is following the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).

Florida statutes provide that the amount in reserves must be maintained in accordance with a formula that is based upon the useful life of the asset for which the reserve was established and the replacement cost of that asset. The association may adjust the replacement of reserves to account for changes in the useful life of the asset or changes to the cost of replacing the asset.  While the board cannot change an audited financial statement, if it does not transfer the amount indicated by the CPA to the reserves, the figures will need to be reconciled on the next financial statement. Whether or not the board is allowed to transfer a different amount is the ultimate question for a CPA or tax attorney.

Barbara Billiot Stage, Esq.


GO TO ARCHIVE


Disclaimer: The content of this column can not be considered legal advice.

This column is not a substitute for consultation with legal counsel. 

HOME